'Most efficient way to forward-fill NaN values in numpy array
Example Problem
As a simple example, consider the numpy array arr as defined below:
import numpy as np
arr = np.array([[5, np.nan, np.nan, 7, 2],
[3, np.nan, 1, 8, np.nan],
[4, 9, 6, np.nan, np.nan]])
where arr looks like this in console output:
array([[ 5., nan, nan, 7., 2.],
[ 3., nan, 1., 8., nan],
[ 4., 9., 6., nan, nan]])
I would now like to row-wise 'forward-fill' the nan values in array arr. By that I mean replacing each nan value with the nearest valid value from the left. The desired result would look like this:
array([[ 5., 5., 5., 7., 2.],
[ 3., 3., 1., 8., 8.],
[ 4., 9., 6., 6., 6.]])
Tried thus far
I've tried using for-loops:
for row_idx in range(arr.shape[0]):
for col_idx in range(arr.shape[1]):
if np.isnan(arr[row_idx][col_idx]):
arr[row_idx][col_idx] = arr[row_idx][col_idx - 1]
I've also tried using a pandas dataframe as an intermediate step (since pandas dataframes have a very neat built-in method for forward-filling):
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame(arr)
df.fillna(method='ffill', axis=1, inplace=True)
arr = df.as_matrix()
Both of the above strategies produce the desired result, but I keep on wondering: wouldn't a strategy that uses only numpy vectorized operations be the most efficient one?
Summary
Is there another more efficient way to 'forward-fill' nan values in numpy arrays? (e.g. by using numpy vectorized operations)
Update: Solutions Comparison
I've tried to time all solutions thus far. This was my setup script:
import numba as nb
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
def random_array():
choices = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, np.nan]
out = np.random.choice(choices, size=(1000, 10))
return out
def loops_fill(arr):
out = arr.copy()
for row_idx in range(out.shape[0]):
for col_idx in range(1, out.shape[1]):
if np.isnan(out[row_idx, col_idx]):
out[row_idx, col_idx] = out[row_idx, col_idx - 1]
return out
@nb.jit
def numba_loops_fill(arr):
'''Numba decorator solution provided by shx2.'''
out = arr.copy()
for row_idx in range(out.shape[0]):
for col_idx in range(1, out.shape[1]):
if np.isnan(out[row_idx, col_idx]):
out[row_idx, col_idx] = out[row_idx, col_idx - 1]
return out
def pandas_fill(arr):
df = pd.DataFrame(arr)
df.fillna(method='ffill', axis=1, inplace=True)
out = df.as_matrix()
return out
def numpy_fill(arr):
'''Solution provided by Divakar.'''
mask = np.isnan(arr)
idx = np.where(~mask,np.arange(mask.shape[1]),0)
np.maximum.accumulate(idx,axis=1, out=idx)
out = arr[np.arange(idx.shape[0])[:,None], idx]
return out
followed by this console input:
%timeit -n 1000 loops_fill(random_array())
%timeit -n 1000 numba_loops_fill(random_array())
%timeit -n 1000 pandas_fill(random_array())
%timeit -n 1000 numpy_fill(random_array())
resulting in this console output:
1000 loops, best of 3: 9.64 ms per loop
1000 loops, best of 3: 377 µs per loop
1000 loops, best of 3: 455 µs per loop
1000 loops, best of 3: 351 µs per loop
Solution 1:[1]
Update: As pointed out by financial_physician in the comments, my initially proposed solution can simply be exchanged with ffill on the reversed array and then reversing the result. There is no relevant performance loss. My initial solution seems to be 2% or 3% faster according to %timeit. I updated the code example below but left my initial text as it was.
For those that came here looking for the backward-fill of NaN values, I modified the solution provided by Divakar above to do exactly that. The trick is that you have to do the accumulation on the reversed array using the minimum except for the maximum.
Here is the code:
# ffill along axis 1, as provided in the answer by Divakar
def ffill(arr):
mask = np.isnan(arr)
idx = np.where(~mask, np.arange(mask.shape[1]), 0)
np.maximum.accumulate(idx, axis=1, out=idx)
out = arr[np.arange(idx.shape[0])[:,None], idx]
return out
# Simple solution for bfill provided by financial_physician in comment below
def bfill(arr):
return ffill(arr[:, ::-1])[:, ::-1]
# My outdated modification of Divakar's answer to do a backward-fill
def bfill_old(arr):
mask = np.isnan(arr)
idx = np.where(~mask, np.arange(mask.shape[1]), mask.shape[1] - 1)
idx = np.minimum.accumulate(idx[:, ::-1], axis=1)[:, ::-1]
out = arr[np.arange(idx.shape[0])[:,None], idx]
return out
# Test both functions
arr = np.array([[5, np.nan, np.nan, 7, 2],
[3, np.nan, 1, 8, np.nan],
[4, 9, 6, np.nan, np.nan]])
print('Array:')
print(arr)
print('\nffill')
print(ffill(arr))
print('\nbfill')
print(bfill(arr))
Output:
Array:
[[ 5. nan nan 7. 2.]
[ 3. nan 1. 8. nan]
[ 4. 9. 6. nan nan]]
ffill
[[5. 5. 5. 7. 2.]
[3. 3. 1. 8. 8.]
[4. 9. 6. 6. 6.]]
bfill
[[ 5. 7. 7. 7. 2.]
[ 3. 1. 1. 8. nan]
[ 4. 9. 6. nan nan]]
Edit: Update according to comment of MS_
Solution 2:[2]
I liked Divakar's answer on pure numpy. Here's a generalized function for n-dimensional arrays:
def np_ffill(arr, axis):
idx_shape = tuple([slice(None)] + [np.newaxis] * (len(arr.shape) - axis - 1))
idx = np.where(~np.isnan(arr), np.arange(arr.shape[axis])[idx_shape], 0)
np.maximum.accumulate(idx, axis=axis, out=idx)
slc = [np.arange(k)[tuple([slice(None) if dim==i else np.newaxis
for dim in range(len(arr.shape))])]
for i, k in enumerate(arr.shape)]
slc[axis] = idx
return arr[tuple(slc)]
AFIK pandas can only work with two dimensions, despite having multi-index to make up for it. The only way to accomplish this would be to flatten a DataFrame, unstack desired level, restack, and finally reshape as original. This unstacking/restacking/reshaping, with the pandas sorting involved, is just unnecessary overhead to achieve the same result.
Testing:
def random_array(shape):
choices = [1, 2, 3, 4, np.nan]
out = np.random.choice(choices, size=shape)
return out
ra = random_array((2, 4, 8))
print('arr')
print(ra)
print('\nffull')
print(np_ffill(ra, 1))
raise SystemExit
Output:
arr
[[[ 3. nan 4. 1. 4. 2. 2. 3.]
[ 2. nan 1. 3. nan 4. 4. 3.]
[ 3. 2. nan 4. nan nan 3. 4.]
[ 2. 2. 2. nan 1. 1. nan 2.]]
[[ 2. 3. 2. nan 3. 3. 3. 3.]
[ 3. 3. 1. 4. 1. 4. 1. nan]
[ 4. 2. nan 4. 4. 3. nan 4.]
[ 2. 4. 2. 1. 4. 1. 3. nan]]]
ffull
[[[ 3. nan 4. 1. 4. 2. 2. 3.]
[ 2. nan 1. 3. 4. 4. 4. 3.]
[ 3. 2. 1. 4. 4. 4. 3. 4.]
[ 2. 2. 2. 4. 1. 1. 3. 2.]]
[[ 2. 3. 2. nan 3. 3. 3. 3.]
[ 3. 3. 1. 4. 1. 4. 1. 3.]
[ 4. 2. 1. 4. 4. 3. 1. 4.]
[ 2. 4. 2. 1. 4. 1. 3. 4.]]]
Solution 3:[3]
Use Numba. This should give a significant speedup:
import numba
@numba.jit
def loops_fill(arr):
...
Solution 4:[4]
I like Divakar's answer, but it doesn't work for an edge case where a row starts with np.nan, like the arr below
arr = np.array([[9, np.nan, 4, np.nan, 6, 6, 7, 2, 3, np.nan],
[ np.nan, 5, 5, 6, 5, 3, 2, 1, np.nan, 10]])
The output using Divakar's code would be:
[[ 9. 9. 4. 4. 6. 6. 7. 2. 3. 3.]
[nan 4. 5. 6. 5. 3. 2. 1. 1. 10.]]
Divakar's code can be simplified a bit, and the simplified version solves this issue at the same time:
arr[np.isnan(arr)] = arr[np.nonzero(np.isnan(arr))[0], np.nonzero(np.isnan(arr))[1]-1]
In case of several np.nans in a row (either in the beginning or in the middle), just repeat this operation several times. For instance, if the array has 5 consecutive np.nans, the following code will "forward fill" all of them with the number before these np.nans:
for i in range(0, 5):
value[np.isnan(value)] = value[np.nonzero(np.isnan(value))[0], np.nonzero(np.isnan(value))[1]-1]
Solution 5:[5]
For those who are interested in the problem of having leading np.nan after foward-filling, the following works:
mask = np.isnan(arr)
first_non_zero_idx = (~mask!=0).argmax(axis=1) #Get indices of first non-zero values
arr = [ np.hstack([
[arr[i,first_nonzero]]*(first_nonzero),
arr[i,first_nonzero:]])
for i, first_nonzero in enumerate(first_non_zero_idx) ]
Solution 6:[6]
bottleneck push function is a good option to forward fill. It's normally used internally in packages like Xarray, it should be faster than other alternatives and the package also has a set of benchmarks.
Example:
import numpy as np
from bottleneck import push
a = np.array(
[
[1, np.nan, 3],
[np.nan, 3, 2],
[2, np.nan, np.nan]
]
)
push(a, axis=0)
array([[ 1., nan, 3.],
[ 1., 3., 2.],
[ 2., 3., 2.]])
Solution 7:[7]
Use bottleneck module, it comes along with pandas or numpy module so no need to separately install.
Below code should give you desired result.
import bottleneck as bn
bn.push(arr,axis=1)
Solution 8:[8]
If you're willing to use Pandas/ xarray: Let axis be the direction you wish to ffill/bfill over, as shown below,
xr.DataArray(arr).ffill(f'dim_{axis}').values
xr.DataArray(arr).bfill(f'dim_{axis}').values
More information: http://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/generated/xarray.DataArray.ffill.html https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/reference/api/pandas.DataFrame.ffill.html
Solution 9:[9]
One liner:
result = np.where(np.isnan(arr), 0, arr)
In a function with forcing float (I needed it in my case because I had dtype=object).
def fillna(arr):
arr = np.array(arr,dtype=float)
out = np.where(np.isnan(arr), 0, arr)
return out
arr = np.array([[5, np.nan, np.nan, 7, 2],
[3, np.nan, 1, 8, np.nan],
[4, 9, 6, np.nan, np.nan]])
result = fillna(arr)
print(result)
# result
# array([[5., 0., 0., 7., 2.],
# [3., 0., 1., 8., 0.],
# [4., 9., 6., 0., 0.]])
Solution 10:[10]
unless I miss something, the solutions does not works on any example:
arr = np.array([[ 3.],
[ 8.],
[np.nan],
[ 7.],
[np.nan],
[ 1.],
[np.nan],
[ 3.],
[ 8.],
[ 8.]])
print("A:::: \n", arr)
print("numpy_fill::: \n ", numpy_fill(arr))
print("loop_fill", loops_fill(arr))
A::::
[[ 3.]
[ 8.]
[nan]
[ 7.]
[nan]
[ 1.]
[nan]
[ 3.]
[ 8.]
[ 8.]]
numpy_fill:::
[[ 3.]
[ 8.]
[nan]
[ 7.]
[nan]
[ 1.]
[nan]
[ 3.]
[ 8.]
[ 8.]]
loop_fill [[ 3.]
[ 8.]
[nan]
[ 7.]
[nan]
[ 1.]
[nan]
[ 3.]
[ 8.]
[ 8.]]
Comments ??
Solution 11:[11]
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|---|
| Solution 1 | |
| Solution 2 | Scott B |
| Solution 3 | shx2 |
| Solution 4 | |
| Solution 5 | christian_bock |
| Solution 6 | |
| Solution 7 | |
| Solution 8 | |
| Solution 9 | |
| Solution 10 | LearnToGrow |
| Solution 11 | Tan Phan |