'Rails, is find_by().present? more performant than where().exists?
This question arose from me doing 2 types of performance tweaks:
- changing a lot of my
where().present?statements towhere().exists? - changing a lot of my
where().firsttofind_by()
Sitting at the intersection of this is situations where I had previously written .where().first.present? and I'm wondering what would be more performant to change it to: .find_by().present? or .where().exists?
Solution 1:[1]
- Changing
where().present?towhere().exists?
where().present? or find_by().present? will always fetch the complete user record from the table:
SELECT * FROM xyz WHERE xyz.name = 'Deepesh'
whereas where().exists? or where().any? will run this query:
SELECT 1 FROM xyz WHERE xyz.name = 'Deepesh' LIMIT 1
So obviously exists? or any? would be better in terms of performance until you need that record you are checking to fetch some information or use it somewhere, for example:
user = User.find_by(name: 'Deepesh')
user.do_something if user.present?
so here you need to perform some action on that user if the record is present then using present? would be sensible.
Note: The time we would save using exists? would be the initialization of the ActiveRecord object, present? would initialize one, and exists will not. Read more here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/30192978/4207394
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|---|
| Solution 1 |
