'Using only certain layers from pretrained network for transfer learning
I am building a model for human face segmentation into skin and non-skin area. As a model, I am using the model/method shown here as a starting point and adding a dense layer at the end with sigmoid activation. The model works very well for my purpose, giving good dice metric score. The model uses 2 pre-trained layers from Resnet50 as a model backbone for feature detection. I have read several articles, books and code but couldn't find any information on how to determine which layer to choses for feature extraction. I compared the Resnet50 architecture with Xception and picked up two similar layers, replaced the layer in the original network (here) and ran the training. I got similar results, not better not worse. I have the following questions
- How to determine which layer is responsible for low-level/high-level features?
- Does using only pre-trained layers any better than using full pre-trained networks in terms of training time and the number of trainable parameters?
- where can I find more information about using only layers from pre-trained networks?
here is the code for quick over-view
def DeeplabV3Plus(image_size, num_classes):
model_input = keras.Input(shape=(image_size, image_size, 3))
resnet50 = keras.applications.ResNet50(
weights="imagenet", include_top=False, input_tensor=model_input)
x = resnet50.get_layer("conv4_block6_2_relu").output
x = DilatedSpatialPyramidPooling(x)
input_a = layers.UpSampling2D(size=(image_size // 4 // x.shape[1], image_size // 4 // x.shape[2]), interpolation="bilinear")(x)
input_b = resnet50.get_layer("conv2_block3_2_relu").output
input_b = convolution_block(input_b, num_filters=48, kernel_size=1)
x = layers.Concatenate(axis=-1)([input_a, input_b])
x = convolution_block(x)
x = convolution_block(x)
x = layers.UpSampling2D(size=(image_size // x.shape[1], image_size // x.shape[2]), interpolation="bilinear")(x)
model_output = layers.Conv2D(num_classes, kernel_size=(1, 1), padding="same")(x)
return keras.Model(inputs=model_input, outputs=model_output)
And here is my modified code using Xception layers as the backbone
def DeeplabV3Plus(image_size, num_classes):
model_input = keras.Input(shape=(image_size, image_size, 3))
Xception_model = keras.applications.Xception(
weights="imagenet", include_top=False, input_tensor=model_input)
xception_x1 = Xception_model.get_layer("block9_sepconv3_act").output
x = DilatedSpatialPyramidPooling(xception_x1)
input_a = layers.UpSampling2D(size=(image_size // 4 // x.shape[1], image_size // 4 // x.shape[2]), interpolation="bilinear")(x)
input_a = layers.AveragePooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2))(input_a)
xception_x2 = Xception_model.get_layer("block4_sepconv1_act").output
input_b = convolution_block(xception_x2, num_filters=256, kernel_size=1)
x = layers.Concatenate(axis=-1)([input_a, input_b])
x = convolution_block(x)
x = convolution_block(x)
x = layers.UpSampling2D(size=(image_size // x.shape[1], image_size // x.shape[2]),interpolation="bilinear")(x)
x = layers.Conv2D(num_classes, kernel_size=(1, 1), padding="same")(x)
model_output = layers.Dense(x.shape[2], activation='sigmoid')(x)
return keras.Model(inputs=model_input, outputs=model_output)
Thanks in advance!
Solution 1:[1]
- In general, the first layers (the ones closer to the input) are the one responsible for learning high-level features, whereas the last layers are more dataset/task-specific. This is the reason why, when transfer learning, you usually want to delete only the last few layers to replace them with others which can deal with your specific problem.
- It depends. Transfering the whole network, without deleting nor adding any new layer, basically means that the network won't learn anything new (unless you are not freezing the layers - in that case you are fine tuning). On the other hand, if you delete some layers and add a few more, than you the number of trainable parameters only depend on the new layers you just added.
What I suggest you to do is:
- Delete a few layers from a pre-trained network, freeze these layers and add a few more layers (even just one)
- Train the new network with a certain learning rate (usually this learning rate is not very low)
- Fine Tune!: unfreeze all the layers, lower the learning rate, and re-train the whole network
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|---|
| Solution 1 | Raoul Raftopoulos |
