'Common elements in two lists

I have two ArrayList objects with three integers each. I want to find a way to return the common elements of the two lists. Has anybody an idea how I can achieve this?



Solution 1:[1]

Use Collection#retainAll().

listA.retainAll(listB);
// listA now contains only the elements which are also contained in listB.

If you want to avoid that changes are being affected in listA, then you need to create a new one.

List<Integer> common = new ArrayList<Integer>(listA);
common.retainAll(listB);
// common now contains only the elements which are contained in listA and listB.

Solution 2:[2]

You can use set intersection operations with your ArrayList objects.

Something like this:

List<Integer> l1 = new ArrayList<Integer>();

l1.add(1);
l1.add(2);
l1.add(3);

List<Integer> l2= new ArrayList<Integer>();
l2.add(4);
l2.add(2);
l2.add(3);

System.out.println("l1 == "+l1);
System.out.println("l2 == "+l2);

List<Integer> l3 = new ArrayList<Integer>(l2);
l3.retainAll(l1);

    System.out.println("l3 == "+l3);

Now, l3 should have only common elements between l1 and l2.

CONSOLE OUTPUT
l1 == [1, 2, 3]
l2 == [4, 2, 3]
l3 == [2, 3]

Solution 3:[3]

Why reinvent the wheel? Use Commons Collections:

CollectionUtils.intersection(java.util.Collection a, java.util.Collection b)

Solution 4:[4]

Using Java 8's Stream.filter() method in combination with List.contains():

import static java.util.Arrays.asList;
import static java.util.stream.Collectors.toList;

/* ... */

List<Integer> list1 = asList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
List<Integer> list2 = asList(1, 3, 5, 7, 9);
    
List<Integer> common = list1.stream().filter(list2::contains).collect(toList());

Solution 5:[5]

consider two list L1 ans L2

Using Java8 we can easily find it out

L1.stream().filter(L2::contains).collect(Collectors.toList())

Solution 6:[6]

You can get the common elements between two lists using the method "retainAll". This method will remove all unmatched elements from the list to which it applies.

Ex.: list.retainAll(list1);

In this case from the list, all the elements which are not in list1 will be removed and only those will be remaining which are common between list and list1.

List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<>();
list.add(10);
list.add(13);
list.add(12);
list.add(11);

List<Integer> list1 = new ArrayList<>();
list1.add(10);
list1.add(113);
list1.add(112);
list1.add(111);
//before retainAll
System.out.println(list);
System.out.println(list1);
//applying retainAll on list
list.retainAll(list1);
//After retainAll
System.out.println("list::"+list);
System.out.println("list1::"+list1);

Output:

[10, 13, 12, 11]
[10, 113, 112, 111]
list::[10]
list1::[10, 113, 112, 111]

NOTE: After retainAll applied on the list, the list contains common element between list and list1.

Solution 7:[7]

enter image description here

List<String> lista =new ArrayList<String>();
List<String> listb =new ArrayList<String>();

lista.add("Isabella");
lista.add("Angelina");
lista.add("Pille");
lista.add("Hazem");

listb.add("Isabella");
listb.add("Angelina");
listb.add("Bianca");

// Create an aplusb list which will contain both list (list1 and list2) in which common element will occur twice 
List<String> listapluslistb =new ArrayList<String>(lista);    
listapluslistb.addAll(listb);
                
// Create an aunionb set which will contain both list (list1 and list2) in which common element will occur once
Set<String> listaunionlistb =new HashSet<String>(lista);
listaunionlistb.addAll(listb);
                
for(String s:listaunionlistb)
{
    listapluslistb.remove(s);
}
System.out.println(listapluslistb);

Solution 8:[8]

public <T> List<T> getIntersectOfCollections(Collection<T> first, Collection<T> second) {
        return first.stream()
                .filter(second::contains)
                .collect(Collectors.toList());
    }

Solution 9:[9]

    // Create two collections:
    LinkedList<String> listA =  new LinkedList<String>();
    ArrayList<String> listB =  new ArrayList<String>();

    // Add some elements to listA:
    listA.add("A");
    listA.add("B");
    listA.add("C");
    listA.add("D");

    // Add some elements to listB:
    listB.add("A");
    listB.add("B");
    listB.add("C");

    // use 

    List<String> common = new ArrayList<String>(listA);
    // use common.retainAll

    common.retainAll(listB);

    System.out.println("The common collection is : " + common);

Solution 10:[10]

In case you want to do it yourself..

List<Integer> commons = new ArrayList<Integer>();

for (Integer igr : group1) {
    if (group2.contains(igr)) {
        commons.add(igr);
    }
}

System.out.println("Common elements are :: -");
for (Integer igr : commons) {
    System.out.println(" "+igr);
}

Solution 11:[11]

public static <T> List<T> getCommonElements(
            java.util.Collection<T> a,
            java.util.Collection<T> b
            ) {
        if(a==null && b==null) return new ArrayList<>();
        if(a!=null && a.size()==0) return new ArrayList<>(b);           
        if(b!=null && b.size()==0) return new ArrayList<>(a);
        
        Set<T> set= a instanceof HashSet?(HashSet<T>)a:new HashSet<>(a);
        return b.stream().filter(set::contains).collect(Collectors.toList());
    }

For better time performance, please use HashSet (O(1) look up) instead of List(O(n) look ups)

Time complexity- O(b) Space Complexity- O(a)

Solution 12:[12]

Some of the answers above are similar but not the same so posting it as a new answer.

Solution:
1. Use HashSet to hold elements which need to be removed
2. Add all elements of list1 to HashSet
3. iterate list2 and remove elements from a HashSet which are present in list2 ==> which are present in both list1 and list2
4. Now iterate over HashSet and remove elements from list1(since we have added all elements of list1 to set), finally, list1 has all common elements
Note: We can add all elements of list2 and in a 3rd iteration, we should remove elements from list2.

Time complexity: O(n)
Space Complexity: O(n)

Code:

import com.sun.tools.javac.util.Assert;
import org.apache.commons.collections4.CollectionUtils;

    List<Integer> list1 = new ArrayList<>();
    list1.add(1);
    list1.add(2);
    list1.add(3);
    list1.add(4);
    list1.add(5);

    List<Integer> list2 = new ArrayList<>();
    list2.add(1);
    list2.add(3);
    list2.add(5);
    list2.add(7);
    Set<Integer> toBeRemoveFromList1 = new HashSet<>(list1);
    System.out.println("list1:" + list1);
    System.out.println("list2:" + list2);
    for (Integer n : list2) {
        if (toBeRemoveFromList1.contains(n)) {
            toBeRemoveFromList1.remove(n);
        }
    }
    System.out.println("toBeRemoveFromList1:" + toBeRemoveFromList1);
    for (Integer n : toBeRemoveFromList1) {
        list1.remove(n);
    }
    System.out.println("list1:" + list1);
    System.out.println("collectionUtils:" + CollectionUtils.intersection(list1, list2));
    Assert.check(CollectionUtils.intersection(list1, list2).containsAll(list1));

output:

list1:[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
list2:[1, 3, 5, 7]
toBeRemoveFromList1:[2, 4]
list1:[1, 3, 5]
collectionUtils:[1, 3, 5]

Solution 13:[13]

Below code Remove common elements in the list

List<String> result =  list1.stream().filter(item-> !list2.contains(item)).collect(Collectors.toList());

Retrieve common elements

List<String> result = list1.stream()
                .distinct()
                .filter(list::contains)
                .collect(Collectors.toList());

Solution 14:[14]

The question talks about three items and many of the suggestions suggest using retainAll. I think it must be stated that as the size of the lists grown retainAll seems to become more inefficient.

In my tests I found that converting to Sets and looping is around 60 times faster than using retainAll for Lists with 1000s of items

  List<Integer> common(List<Integer> biggerList, List<Integer> smallerList) {
    Set<Integer> set1 = new HashSet<>(biggerList);
    List<Integer> result = new ArrayList<>(smallerList.size());
    for (Integer i : smallerList) {
      if (set1.contains(i)) {
        result.add(i);
      }
    }
    return result;
  }