'check array exist in array using every and some
I have arr = [1,2,3] and ids = [1,2,3,4,5,6]. I want to find if any of the arr item exist in the ids. If yes the invalid is true.
Which of the below code is better? or they are the same thing?
const invalid = !arr.every((id) => ~ids.indexOf(id));
const invalid = arr.some((id) => ids.includes(id));
Solution 1:[1]
The two statements have a very different semantics.
The callbacks are the same, ie ids.includes(id) === true is equivalent to ~ids.indexOf(id) != 0. But arr.some() and !arr.every() have a different semantics:
some()returnstrueif at least one element fits the condidition!every()returnstrueif at least one element doesn't fit the condition
So actually your first snippet is not checking, if there is at least one element in arr that is also contained in ids, but if there is at least one element in arr that is not contained in ids
So the correct version of first snippet would be
const invalid = !arr.every((id) => !(~ids.indexOf(id)));
Ie, checkig if not every element of arr is not contained in ids. From a computational standpoint, they are more or less the same:
indexOfandincludesreturn on the first element element they findsomestops when the callback returnstruefor the first timeeverystops when the callback returnsfalsefor the first time- there is of course a (little) overhead for
~and!
But if you compare this to your second snippet, it seems pretty obvious, that it is far more complex to read and understand and therefore far more complex to maintain.
const
arr = [1,2,3],
ids = [1,2,3,4,5,6]
const
i1 = !arr.every((id) => ~ids.indexOf(id)),
i2 = arr.some((id) => ids.includes(id)),
i3 = !arr.every((id) => !(~ids.indexOf(id)));
console.log(i1, i2, i3)
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|---|
| Solution 1 |
