'Will it be simpler to convert this code from CStringArray to std::vector<CString>?
Given this code:
void CSelectNamesDlg::ShuffleArray(CString strName, CStringArray *pAryStrNames)
{
if (pAryStrNames == nullptr)
return;
const auto iSize = pAryStrNames->GetSize();
if (iSize > 1)
{
// First, we must locate strName in the array
auto i = CSelectNamesDlg::LocateText(strName, pAryStrNames);
if (i != -1)
{
const auto iName = i;
// We must now shuffle the names from the bottom to the top
const auto iCount = gsl::narrow<int>(iSize) - iName;
for (i = 0; i < iCount; i++)
{
CString strTemp = pAryStrNames->GetAt(iSize-1);
pAryStrNames->RemoveAt(iSize-1);
pAryStrNames->InsertAt(0, strTemp);
}
}
}
}
int CSelectNamesDlg::LocateText(CString strText, const CStringArray *pAryStrText)
{
bool bFound = false;
int i{};
if (pAryStrText != nullptr)
{
const auto iSize = pAryStrText->GetSize();
for (i = 0; i < iSize; i++)
{
if (pAryStrText->GetAt(i) == strText)
{
// Found him!
bFound = true;
break;
}
}
}
if (!bFound)
i = -1;
return (int)i;
}
If I convert my CStringArray into a std::vector<CString is it going to be simpler to achieve the same PerformShuffle and LocateText methods?
Should I just stay with CStringArray?
Solution 1:[1]
I know of 1 (ONE!) benefit of MFC array over std::vector - they support MFC-style serialization. If you use it - you may be stuck.
However, if you don't - I would use std::vector<CString>. Your LocateText (that is overly verbose) will become obsolete - just use find
Also, your ShuffleArray is very inefficient (remove/insert one item at a time). Using a vector will allow you to do something like Best way to extract a subvector from a vector?
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|---|
| Solution 1 | Vlad Feinstein |
