'Why am I getting the same result when using p.adjust for the Holm and Bonferroni methods?
I've run several regressions and I'm trying to see if any of the significant findings hold after a multiple comparison adjustment. I know that Bonferroni adjustment is more conservative than Holm adjustment, so I would expect the outputs to be different, however they weren't. One of the values varied slightly, but not as much as I would have expected given that one of these tests is supposed to be less conservative than the other. I tried another correction method and got similar results. Is there something wrong with my syntax or is this a normal result?
p.vect <- c(.003125, .008947)
p.adjust(p.vect, method = "bonferroni", n=80)
[1] 0.25000 0.71576
p.adjust(p.vect, method = "holm", n=80)
[1] 0.250000 0.706813
p.adjust(p.vect, method = "hochberg", n = 80)
[1] 0.250000 0.706813
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|
