'What's the difference between CSS3's :root pseudo class and html?

I can't seem to find much information about this.

Smashing Magazine seems to be saying that html and :root are the same thing but surely there must be a tiny difference?

csscss-selectorspseudo-class


Solution 1:[1]

One technical difference between them is that :root - being a pseudo class has a greater specificity than html (a type selector)

:root {
  color: red
}
html {
  color: green;
}
<div>hello world</div>

So, in the above example, the :root selector overrides the html selector and the text appears red.

Solution 2:[2]

For HTML documents, there is no difference - your root element is the <html> tag, so html{} and :root{} are (besides from a difference in specificity) semantically equivalent.

However, you can apply CSS not only to HTML, but all XML-like documents. That's why :root is there - to target the document's root element regardless of document type. Most people are confused by the difference because the overwhelmingly predominant use case for CSS is styling HTML documents.

Example: You can style SVG documents with CSS. When styling it, your root element will (obviously;-)) not be html but svg. See the following list of SVG tags.

Solution 3:[3]

Another thing to consider is that it's technically possible to replace the root element using javascript:

<html>
<body>
  <div id=test>
      This will become the root element!
      <style>
        :root { text-decoration: underline; }
        html { color: red; } /* this selector will stop working */
      </style>
  </div>
  <button onclick=document.documentElement.replaceWith(test)>click to replace the root</button>
</body>
</html>

Sources

This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Source: Stack Overflow

Solution Source
Solution 1
Solution 2
Solution 3 12Me21

Related Questions