'Using erase-remove_if idiom
Let's say I have std::vector<std::pair<int,Direction>>.
I am trying to use erase-remove_if idiom to remove pairs from the vector.
stopPoints.erase(std::remove_if(stopPoints.begin(),
stopPoints.end(),
[&](const stopPointPair stopPoint)-> bool { return stopPoint.first == 4; }));
I want to delete all pairs that have .first value set to 4.
In my example I have pairs:
- 4, Up
- 4, Down
- 2, Up
- 6, Up
However, after I execute erase-remove_if, I am left with:
- 2, Up
- 6, Up
- 6, Up
What am I doing wrong here?
Solution 1:[1]
The method std::vector::erase has two overloads:
iterator erase( const_iterator pos );
iterator erase( const_iterator first, const_iterator last );
The first one only remove the element at pos while the second one remove the range [first, last).
Since you forget the last iterator in your call, the first version is chosen by overload resolution, and you only remove the first pair shifted to the end by std::remove_if. You need to do this:
stopPoints.erase(std::remove_if(stopPoints.begin(),
stopPoints.end(),
[&](const stopPointPair stopPoint)-> bool {
return stopPoint.first == 4;
}),
stopPoints.end());
The erase-remove idiom works as follow. Let say you have a vector {2, 4, 3, 6, 4} and you want to remove the 4:
std::vector<int> vec{2, 4, 3, 6, 4};
auto it = std::remove(vec.begin(), vec.end(), 4);
Will transform the vector into {2, 3, 6, A, B} by putting the "removed" values at the end (the values A and B at the end are unspecified (as if the value were moved), which is why you got 6 in your example) and return an iterator to A (the first of the "removed" value).
If you do:
vec.erase(it)
...the first overload of std::vector::erase is chosen and you only remove the value at it, which is the A and get {2, 3, 6, B}.
By adding the second argument:
vec.erase(it, vec.end())
...the second overload is chosen, and you erase value between it and vec.end(), so both A and B are erased.
Solution 2:[2]
I know that at the time this question was asked there was no C++20, so just adding answer for completeness & up-to-date answer for this question, C++20 has now much cleaner & less verbose pattern, using std::erase_if.
See generic code example:
#include <vector>
int main()
{
std::vector<char> cnt(10);
std::iota(cnt.begin(), cnt.end(), '0');
auto erased = std::erase_if(cnt, [](char x) { return (x - '0') % 2 == 0; });
std::cout << erased << " even numbers were erased.\n";
}
Specific question code snippet:
std::erase_if(stopPoints, [&](const stopPointPair stopPoint)-> bool { return stopPoint.first == 4; });
see complete details here:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector/erase2
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|---|
| Solution 1 | |
| Solution 2 |
