'Multiple Regex @Pattern's for 1 Field?
I was attempted to apply multiple @Pattern annotations to a single field:
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=.*[0-9])", message = "Password must contain one digit.")
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=.*[a-z])", message = "Password must contain one lowercase letter.")
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=.*[A-Z])", message = "Password must contain one uppercase letter.")
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=\S+$)", message = "Password must contain no whitespace.")
private String password;
However, I cannot do this. I want individual messages per violated regex constraint on the password field. Is this possible?
My alternative is to use JSF 2.0 f:validatorRegex tags.
Solution 1:[1]
You can use the inner @List annotation of @Pattern:
@Pattern.List({
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=.*[0-9])", message = "Password must contain one digit."),
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=.*[a-z])", message = "Password must contain one lowercase letter."),
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=.*[A-Z])", message = "Password must contain one uppercase letter."),
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=\\S+$)", message = "Password must contain no whitespace.")
})
private String password;
Solution 2:[2]
Gunnar's solution won't work for me... '.+' in his regexp seem to be missing. However, i'm using Michal's patternList and it works like a charm for me. (Play 2.3.x / Ebean-ORM)
@Pattern.List({
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=.*[0-9]).+", message = "Password must contain one digit."),
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=.*[a-z]).+", message = "Password must contain one lowercase letter."),
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=.*[A-Z]).+", message = "Password must contain one upper letter."),
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=.*[!@#$%^&*+=?-_()/\"\\.,<>~`;:]).+", message ="Password must contain one special character."),
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=\\S+$).+", message = "Password must contain no whitespace.")
})
@Constraints.Required()
public String password1;
Solution 3:[3]
You might want to look into constraint composition. You would build one annotation per password constraint composed from the @Pattern annotation, and then finally build one composed annotation using the previously defined four. This would require no extra java code.
Otherwise, build (with accompanying java code) a custom annotation called @PasswordValidator.
I tend to like composed validators, as it makes the purpose of the validation annotations clear on their purpose, instead of having many disjoint annotations.
Solution 4:[4]
I modified Gunnar answer and write composite constraint and this now seems to work correctly on 4 unit tests:
@NotNull
@Size(min=6, max=45)
@Pattern.List({
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=.*[0-9]).+", message = "Password must contain one digit."),
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=.*[a-z]).+", message = "Password must contain one lowercase letter."),
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=.*[A-Z]).+", message = "Password must contain one uppercase letter."),
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=.*[!@#$%^&*+=?-_()/\"\\.,<>~`;:]).+", message ="Password must contain one special character."),
@Pattern(regexp = "(?=\\S+$).+", message = "Password must contain no whitespace.")
})
@Constraint(validatedBy = {}) // constraints composition
@Target({METHOD, FIELD, ANNOTATION_TYPE, CONSTRUCTOR, PARAMETER})
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public @interface StrongPassword {
String message() default "Password doesn't match bean validation constraints.";
Class<?>[] groups() default {};
Class<? extends Payload>[] payload() default {};
}
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|---|
| Solution 1 | Jens Piegsa |
| Solution 2 | Jens Piegsa |
| Solution 3 | JP Belanger |
| Solution 4 | Jens Piegsa |
