'Loosing data using st_join
I am trying to perform a spatial join of two sf shape files.I am losing all information from the second data set (i.e output_inmap). Whichever dataset is placed second will return all NA values. Anyone know what could be happening?
output_inmap <- st_read("processed/ceidars_data_inmap.shp")
output_inmap <-st_transform(output_inmap, crs=3310)
unzip("census-tract.zip")
census_tracts <- st_read("census-tract/tl_2019_06_tract.shp")
st_transform(census_tracts, crs = 3310)
st_transform(output_inmap, crs = 3310)
TC_1<- st_join(census_tracts, output_inmap)
I am losing all information from the second data set (i.e output_inmap). Whichever dataset is placed second will return all NA values. Anyone know what could be happening?
Solution 1:[1]
Your second st_transform (of the census tracts) seems to be leading nowhere; consider this code (slightly adjusted via dplyr style pipe) to ensure both spatial objects are on the same CRS.
You may also consider setting parameter left of the sf::st_join() call (by default true) to false = change behaviour from left (preserving) to inner (filtering) style join. Sometimes this makes for a more concise code.
library(sf)
library(dplyr)
output_inmap <- st_read("processed/ceidars_data_inmap.shp") %>%
st_transform(crs=3310)
unzip("census-tract.zip")
census_tracts <- st_read("census-tract/tl_2019_06_tract.shp") %>%
st_transform(crs = 3310)
TC_1<- st_join(census_tracts, output_inmap)
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|---|
| Solution 1 | Jindra Lacko |
