'Is Q_INTERFACES macro needed for child classes?
If I have class A that implements an interface (and uses Q_INTERFACES macro), then does child class B : public A also need to use the Q_INTERFACES macro?
For example:
IMovable.h
#include <QObject>
class IMovable
{
public slots:
    virtual void moveLeft(int distance) = 0;
    virtual void moveRight(int distance) = 0;
    virtual void moveUp(int distance) = 0;
    virtual void moveDown(int distance) = 0;
signals:
    virtual void moved(int x, int y) = 0;
};
Q_DECLARE_INTERFACE(IMovable, "my_IMovable")
A.h
#include <QObject>
#include "IMovable.h"
class A : public QObject, public IMovable
{
    Q_OBJECT
    Q_INTERFACES(IMovable)
public:
    explicit A(QObject *parent = nullptr);
    virtual ~A();
public slots:
    //implement IMovable public slots
    void moveLeft(int distance) override;
    void moveRight(int distance) override;
    void moveUp(int distance) override;
    void moveDown(int distance) override;
signals:
    //implement IMovable signals
    void moved(int x, int y) override;
};
B.h
#include "A.h"
class B : public A
{
    Q_OBJECT
    // Do I need Q_INTERFACES(IMovable) here?
    ...
};
							
						Solution 1:[1]
Q_INTERFACES is needed for the qobject_cast function to work correctly with the interfaces a class implements. So if you want to use this function you have to place Q_INTERFACES into your class.
Docs aren't clear on what happens with the inheritance but the implementation of the generated qt_metacast function is always calling their parent qt_metacast. So in your example, even if you don't put the Q_INTERFACES macro into the B class it should still work with the qobject_cast function because it would pass it to A to execute.
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source | 
|---|---|
| Solution 1 | ixSci | 
