'How to position LaTeX table in Overleaf
I have a correlation matrix output in R, when I paste it Overleaf the table is too far to the right and some values are missing. I have the same issue with other tables as well, how can I fix this? The code for this matrix is the following
\begin{table}[ht]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{rllllllllllllll}
\hline
& avsumarwinsorized & FE & dispstd & winsorizedNetOptLM & roa & roastd & RETURN & MV & beta & BTM & lognoa & winsmin & winsmax & winsmean \\
\hline
avsumarwinsorized & 1.000 & -0.017* & -0.018* & 0.068*** & -0.005 & -0.011 & 0.002 & -0.014 & -0.017* & -0.008 & -0.010 & 0.019* & 0.003 & 0.019* \\
FE & -0.026*** & 1.000 & 0.582*** & -0.205*** & -0.298*** & 0.290*** & -0.205*** & -0.351*** & 0.186*** & 0.358*** & -0.243*** & -0.089*** & -0.050*** & -0.091*** \\
dispstd & -0.025** & 0.557*** & 1.000 & -0.282*** & -0.444*** & 0.314*** & -0.338*** & -0.347*** & 0.230*** & 0.466*** & -0.153*** & -0.104*** & -0.057*** & -0.100*** \\
winsorizedNetOptLM & 0.073*** & -0.067*** & -0.050*** & 1.000 & 0.285*** & -0.090*** & 0.246*** & 0.072*** & -0.021** & -0.251*** & 0.032*** & 0.046*** & -0.092*** & 0.005 \\
roa & -0.017* & -0.068*** & -0.056*** & 0.160*** & 1.000 & -0.023** & 0.284*** & 0.284*** & -0.145*** & -0.522*** & 0.177*** & 0.064*** & 0.022** & 0.053*** \\
roastd & 0.003 & 0.048*** & 0.034*** & -0.074*** & -0.359*** & 1.000 & -0.092*** & -0.263*** & 0.098*** & -0.064*** & -0.102*** & -0.103*** & -0.075*** & -0.118*** \\
RETURN & -0.007 & -0.062*** & -0.049*** & 0.143*** & 0.156*** & -0.007 & 1.000 & 0.185*** & 0.065*** & -0.365*** & 0.029*** & 0.024** & 0.027*** & 0.018* \\
MV & -0.014 & -0.020** & -0.015* & 0.003 & 0.077*** & -0.055*** & 0.001 & 1.000 & -0.207*** & -0.346*** & 0.672*** & 0.067*** & 0.177*** & 0.117*** \\
beta & -0.019* & 0.068*** & 0.038*** & -0.045*** & -0.054*** & 0.055*** & 0.131*** & -0.121*** & 1.000 & 0.150*** & -0.096*** & -0.036*** & -0.040*** & -0.042*** \\
BTM & -0.015 & -0.075*** & -0.015 & -0.128*** & -0.107*** & 0.024** & -0.134*** & -0.056*** & 0.081*** & 1.000 & -0.238*** & -0.100*** & -0.061*** & -0.088*** \\
lognoa & -0.013 & -0.063*** & -0.028*** & 0.052*** & 0.096*** & -0.076*** & -0.023** & 0.313*** & -0.093*** & -0.091*** & 1.000 & 0.048*** & 0.152*** & 0.093*** \\
winsmin & 0.009 & -0.035*** & -0.023** & 0.038*** & 0.036*** & -0.048*** & 0.006 & -0.012 & -0.038*** & -0.056*** & 0.060*** & 1.000 & 0.357*** & 0.925*** \\
winsmax & 0.001 & -0.031*** & -0.011 & -0.087*** & 0.028*** & -0.016* & -0.001 & 0.081*** & -0.052*** & -0.018* & 0.152*** & 0.288*** & 1.000 & 0.550*** \\
winsmean & 0.010 & -0.036*** & -0.024** & 0.008 & 0.044*** & -0.056*** & -0.005 & 0.028*** & -0.049*** & -0.052*** & 0.104*** & 0.889*** & 0.513*** & 1.000 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
Solution 1:[1]
No way a table this large will reasonable fit onto a page. Even with
- abbreviating some of the verrrrrrrrry long variable names
- reducing the margins of the paper
- using a landscape paper
it will still need an unreadable small size to fit on the page:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[landscape,hmargin=1cm]{geometry}
\begin{document}
\begin{table}[ht]
\centering
\tiny
\begin{tabular}{rllllllllllllll}
\hline
& avs. & FE & dispstd & win. & roa & roastd & RETURN & MV & beta & BTM & lognoa & winsmin & winsmax & winsmean \\
\hline
avs. & 1.000 & -0.017* & -0.018* & 0.068*** & -0.005 & -0.011 & 0.002 & -0.014 & -0.017* & -0.008 & -0.010 & 0.019* & 0.003 & 0.019* \\
FE & -0.026*** & 1.000 & 0.582*** & -0.205*** & -0.298*** & 0.290*** & -0.205*** & -0.351*** & 0.186*** & 0.358*** & -0.243*** & -0.089*** & -0.050*** & -0.091*** \\
dispstd & -0.025** & 0.557*** & 1.000 & -0.282*** & -0.444*** & 0.314*** & -0.338*** & -0.347*** & 0.230*** & 0.466*** & -0.153*** & -0.104*** & -0.057*** & -0.100*** \\
win. & 0.073*** & -0.067*** & -0.050*** & 1.000 & 0.285*** & -0.090*** & 0.246*** & 0.072*** & -0.021** & -0.251*** & 0.032*** & 0.046*** & -0.092*** & 0.005 \\
roa & -0.017* & -0.068*** & -0.056*** & 0.160*** & 1.000 & -0.023** & 0.284*** & 0.284*** & -0.145*** & -0.522*** & 0.177*** & 0.064*** & 0.022** & 0.053*** \\
roastd & 0.003 & 0.048*** & 0.034*** & -0.074*** & -0.359*** & 1.000 & -0.092*** & -0.263*** & 0.098*** & -0.064*** & -0.102*** & -0.103*** & -0.075*** & -0.118*** \\
RETURN & -0.007 & -0.062*** & -0.049*** & 0.143*** & 0.156*** & -0.007 & 1.000 & 0.185*** & 0.065*** & -0.365*** & 0.029*** & 0.024** & 0.027*** & 0.018* \\
MV & -0.014 & -0.020** & -0.015* & 0.003 & 0.077*** & -0.055*** & 0.001 & 1.000 & -0.207*** & -0.346*** & 0.672*** & 0.067*** & 0.177*** & 0.117*** \\
beta & -0.019* & 0.068*** & 0.038*** & -0.045*** & -0.054*** & 0.055*** & 0.131*** & -0.121*** & 1.000 & 0.150*** & -0.096*** & -0.036*** & -0.040*** & -0.042*** \\
BTM & -0.015 & -0.075*** & -0.015 & -0.128*** & -0.107*** & 0.024** & -0.134*** & -0.056*** & 0.081*** & 1.000 & -0.238*** & -0.100*** & -0.061*** & -0.088*** \\
lognoa & -0.013 & -0.063*** & -0.028*** & 0.052*** & 0.096*** & -0.076*** & -0.023** & 0.313*** & -0.093*** & -0.091*** & 1.000 & 0.048*** & 0.152*** & 0.093*** \\
winsmin & 0.009 & -0.035*** & -0.023** & 0.038*** & 0.036*** & -0.048*** & 0.006 & -0.012 & -0.038*** & -0.056*** & 0.060*** & 1.000 & 0.357*** & 0.925*** \\
winsmax & 0.001 & -0.031*** & -0.011 & -0.087*** & 0.028*** & -0.016* & -0.001 & 0.081*** & -0.052*** & -0.018* & 0.152*** & 0.288*** & 1.000 & 0.550*** \\
winsmean & 0.010 & -0.036*** & -0.024** & 0.008 & 0.044*** & -0.056*** & -0.005 & 0.028*** & -0.049*** & -0.052*** & 0.104*** & 0.889*** & 0.513*** & 1.000 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\end{document}
Solution 2:[2]
There is two ways for such a large table
- Change the format to landscape
- User
scaleboxto reduce the size (everything will be small, doesn't worth as a solution)
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|---|
| Solution 1 | samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz |
| Solution 2 | El-houcine Brahim |