'Finding the complexity of Haskell functions
How can I find the complexity (in terms of big-O) for different Haskell functions?
For example, what is the complexity of subsequences?
Solution 1:[1]
Instead of using the element prop on your Route try to component prop like
<Route path="/" component={Home}>
You also must capitalize components.
Solution 2:[2]
React components should use PascalCase names.
export { default as Navbar } from './navBar';
export { default as Footer } from './footer';
export { default as Home } from './home';
...
import { Navbar, Footer, Home } from './components';
ReactDOM.render(
<Router>
<NavBar />
<Routes>
<Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
</Routes>
<Footer />
</Router>,
document.getElementById("root")
);
Solution 3:[3]
You are missing import of Switch from 'react-router-dom' and after you have to wrap your Routes into . And into Routes you have to add all of your components with path not only Home component.
Pseudo code:
import { Switch, Route, Router } from "react-router-dom";
import Home from '.....path'
//import all routing componets
const Routes = () => {
return(
<Switch>
<Route exact path='/' component={Home}>
<Route exact path='/comp1' component={Comp1}>
<Route exact path='/comp2' component={Comp2}>
</Switch>)}
const App = () => {
<Router>
<GlobalNav />
<Container fluid={true}>
<SideNav />
<Routes />
</Container>
</Router>}
Then you can add your navbar anywhere but has to be wrapped into router. I just added as example i can have a typo somewhere but if you follow the concept it should work. And change your components to Pascal naming.
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|---|
| Solution 1 | miklando |
| Solution 2 | Drew Reese |
| Solution 3 | Tomas Schaffer |
