'Fill an array (or arraylist) from SqlDataReader
Is there a way to fill an array via a SqlDataReader (or any other C# ADO.NET object) without looping through all the items? I have a query that is returning a single column, and I want to put that into a string array (or ArrayList, or List, etc).
Solution 1:[1]
It is possible. In .NET 2.0+, SqlDataReader inherits from DbDataReader, which implements IEnumerable (non-generic one). This means that you can use LINQ:
List<string> list = (from IDataRecord r in dataReader
select (string)r["FieldName"]
).ToList();
That said, the loop is still there, it's just hidden in Enumerable.Select, rather than being explicit in your code.
Solution 2:[2]
No, since SqlDataReader is a forward-only read-only stream of rows from a SQL Server database, the stream of rows will be looped through whether explicitly in your code or hidden in a framework implementation (such as DataTable's Load method).
It sounds like using a generic list and then returning the list as an array would be a good option. For example,
List<int> list = new List<int>();
using (SqlDataReader reader = cmd.ExecuteReader())
{
while (reader.Read())
{
list.Add(reader.GetInt32(0));
}
}
return list.ToArray();
In response to your comment, calling ToArray() may be overhead, it depends. Do you need an array of objects to work with or would a generic collection (such as List<T> or ReadOnlyCollection<T>) be more useful?
Solution 3:[3]
Apparently, ever since .NET 1.1 SqlDataReader had the following method:
int size;
object[] data = new object[]{};
size = reader.GetValues(data);
This populates data with the values of the current reader row, assigning into size the number of objects that were put into the array.
Solution 4:[4]
Since any IDataReader implementation (SqlDataReader included) will be a forward-only reader by definition, no there is no way to do this without looping. Even if there were a framework library method to do this it would have to loop through the reader, just like you would.
Solution 5:[5]
The orignial OP asked for Array, ArrayList or List. You can return Array as well. Just call the .ToArray() method and assign it to a previously declared array. Arrays are very fast when it comes to enumerating each element. Much faster than a List if the list has more than 1000 elements. You can return to Array, List, or Dictionary.
ids_array = (from IDataRecord r in idReader
select (string)r["ID"]).ToArray<string>();
Additionally, if you are using a lookup of keys for example, you might consider creating a HashSet object with has excellent lookup performance if you are simply checking one list against another to determine if an elements key exists in the HashSet object. example:
HashSet<string> hs = new HashSet<string>(
(from IDataRecord r in idReader select (string)r["ID"]).AsEnumerable<string>() );
Solution 6:[6]
You have to loop, but there are projects that can make it simpler. Also, try not to use ArrayList, use List instead.
You can checkout FluentAdo for one: http://fluentado.codeplex.com
public IList<UserAccount> List()
{
var list = new FluentCommand<UserAccount>("SELECT ID, UserName, Password FROM UserAccount")
.SetMap(reader => new UserAccount
{
ID = reader.GetInt("ID"),
Password = reader.GetString("Password"),
UserName = reader.GetString("UserName"),
})
.AsList();
return list;
}
Solution 7:[7]
If you read your SqlDataAdapter into a DataTable:
DataTable dt as DataTable;
dt.fill(data);
Then you can use some of the toys in System.Data.DataSetExtensions as referenced in Joel Muller's answer to this question.
In uses a bit of Linq, so you will net .Net 3.5 or higher.
Solution 8:[8]
var array = reader.GetValue("field_name") as long[];
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|---|
| Solution 1 | Pavel Minaev |
| Solution 2 | |
| Solution 3 | JNF |
| Solution 4 | Andrew Hare |
| Solution 5 | RickIsWright |
| Solution 6 | Chris Brandsma |
| Solution 7 | Community |
| Solution 8 | Suraj Rao |
