'Clubbing values of type switch [duplicate]
Following code is working fine
var requestMap map[string]interface{}
for _, value := range requestMap {
switch v := value.(type) {
case []interface{}:
if len(v) == 0 {
// if is empty then no need to throw NA
return http.StatusOK, nil
}
case string:
if len(v) == 0 {
// if is empty then no need to throw NA
return http.StatusOK, nil
}
}
}
But following code is giving invalid argument for len function, I have read this question
var requestMap map[string]interface{}
for _, value := range requestMap {
switch v := value.(type) {
case []interface{}, string:
if len(v) == 0 {
// if is empty then no need to throw NA
return http.StatusOK, nil
}
}
}
Isn't this case statement enough to identify []interface{} or string as value type ?
Why is it still considering interface{} as parameter of len()
Solution 1:[1]
If you list multiple types in a case of a type switch, the static type of the switch variable will be of the type of the original variable. Spec: Switch statements:
In clauses with a case listing exactly one type, the variable has that type; otherwise, the variable has the type of the expression in the TypeSwitchGuard.
So if the switch expression is v := value.(type), the of v in the matching case (listing multiple types) will be the type of value, in your case it will be interface{}. And the builtin len() function does not allow to pass values of type interface{}.
Solution 2:[2]
This is because in the case of the type switch, the v should be converted to a slice of interface ([]interface) and to a string at the same time. The compiler can't decide which to use, so it revert back the value to interface{}, since it can be anything.
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|---|
| Solution 1 | |
| Solution 2 | Fenistil |
