'Azure Synapse Notebooks Vs Azure Databricks notebooks
I was going through the features of Azure Synapse Notebooks Vs Azure Databricks notebooks.
- Are there any major differences between these apart from the component they belong to ?
- Are there any scenarios where one is more appropriate over other?
Solution 1:[1]
1.Are there any major differences between these apart from the component they belong to ?
Azure Synapse:
- It has Open-source Apache Spark (thus not including all features of Databricks Runtime).
- Supports Apache Spark 3.1 (GA) and 3.2 (Preview).
- The supported notebook is Nteract Notebooks.
- Synapse provides co-authoring of a notebook with a condition where one person needs to save the notebook before the other person observes the changes.
Azure Databricks:
- It has an Industry leading Spark (Databricks Runtime) built on a highly optimized version of Apache Spark offering 50x performance.
- Already has support for Spark 3.2.1 with DBR 10.5.
- The supported notebook is Databricks Notebooks.
- Databricks Notebooks support real-time co-authoring (both authors see the changes in real-time) along with automated version control.
2.Are there any scenarios where one is more appropriate over other?
These are the scenarios:
- Any requirement for transformations on real time scenarios, go with Azure Databricks.
- When you have the requirement for Data Warehousing and SQL data analysis, then go with Azure Synapse Analytics.
- If you have any requirement for the development of Machine learning (ML), then go with Azure Databricks that provides you with advanced ML workflows with Git support.
- When you have the requirement to build interactive reports, you can go with Azure Synapse Analytics where you can access Power BI from the Azure Synapse Studio IDE.
SOURCE:
https://hevodata.com/learn/azure-synapse-vs-databricks/#diff2
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|---|
| Solution 1 |
