'Are XMPP server implementations of binding not following the standard?
I recently tried binding based on RFC 6120 (9.1.3 pg 132) with:
<iq id='tn281v37' type='set'><bind xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-bind'/></iq>
I would get a response of 'not well formed':
<stream:error xmlns='jabber:client' xmlns:stream='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams'><not-well-formed xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-streams'/></stream:error>
It took a few days to find out it needed xmlns='jabber:client' :
<iq id='tn281v37' type='set' xmlns='jabber:client'><bind xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-bind'/></iq>
It doesn't look like RFC 6120 has been superseded and every example of binding I find on the web doesn't have it. Is this due to implementation of the server? At the time I was binding to chinwag.im
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|